if said to be non-existing as per other philosophy (avaidhika philosophy) —

does not exist (for those who are unfavourable) —

that which is said as existing or non-existing —

is present for me exclusively as the distinguished one; —

if said to be existing as per own philosophy (vaidhika philosophy) —

you can see that he exists at all times (with a vow to protect us) —

see that (at all places) at all times (in protecting us) he exists —

exists (only to protect us) —

resides permanently —

you can see that he exists, since he is protecting us —

you can see that he resides permanently —

see that he exists (to protect us) —

see that he exists permanently —

see that he himself exists as the protector —

being present without any limitation —

being the omni #present one —

it appears that ī will permeate all over the worlds —

being the essence —

being the antharyāmi of such brahmā, rudhra et al- —

ṣhould be considered as existing since there should be an entity (substratum) for sath bhāvam (existence) or asath bhāvam (non-existence) while making a statement; thus, —